RESUMO
RESUMEN El presente documento propone un modelo de producción crítica-argumentativa para la formación inicial del área de la salud, centrando el proceso de escritura en la participación de los estudiantes como autores y en la redistribución de roles durante el trayecto de producción. El objetivo es mostrar una aproximación a la escritura argumentativa desde cuatro principios propios del marco de la justicia educativa: deliberación, participación, representación autoral y redistribución de roles.
ABSTRACT This document proposes a critical-argumentative production model for initial training in the health area, focusing the writing process on the participation of students as authors and on the redistribution of roles during the production stage. The objective is to show an approach to argumentative writing from four principles of the framework of educational justice: deliberation, participation, author representation and role redistribution.
Assuntos
Redação , Justiça SocialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Educational justice is one of the fundamental dimensions of social justice, and the progress of each society depends on its realization. Since students are engaged in the educational process, recognizing their viewpoints can provide useful guidance to correct existing problems. The purpose of this study is to investigate the observance of educational justice from the viewpoint of medical students in southeastern Iran. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 200 students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, southeastern Iran, in 2017 by stratified sampling. The tool for measuring organizational justice was a questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by content validity method, and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha (0.8). Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage), Chi-square test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: The mean age of students was 21.7 ± 2.91 years. Fifty percent of students assessed the educational justice as good to excellent, and based on a general score, educational justice was observed in 73.2% of cases. The one-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between the scores of educational justice from the viewpoints of students in different faculties of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to the results, students' needs for achieving educational justice have been identified in this study. This study can provide useful guidance to correct existing problems and help policymakers in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences to achieve a full educational justice.
